Episode 15: Bringing our Anger to God and culture matters

This month, we take a look into the concept of being angry at God, and Jim answers some matters around the culture of “shipping” and “stirring”.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

ARE WE ALLOWED TO BE ANGRY AT GOD? WE ARE TOLD WE CAN BRING OUR SORROWS TO HIM, BUT IS GETTING ANGRY AT GOD IMPLYING THAT HE IS IN THE WRONG, WHICH IS NEVER THE CASE?

If the question was, “Is it good or right to be angry at God?”, the answer most certainly would be, “No.” As the question already included very wisely, that would imply accusing God of being “in the wrong, which is never the case.” However, in our limited knowledge and in our woefully imperfect state, we are quite familiar with the emotion of anger. Especially when we feel out of options, we often direct our anger against God whom we assume could have done something about the situation for which we find ourselves blaming Him. He is after all, sovereignly responsible for everything!

Interestingly enough, as a patient Heavenly Father, He does often allow it. The fact that we are quite often angry at God and the world still has not yet come to utter destruction is an obvious testimony to His patience. Especially in the Old Testament, the most frustrating and thankless job was that of being a prophet. Jonah was angry that God’s righteous anger did not burn against the Ninevites.   But in [Jonah 4] we find a great discourse on the topic of anger with God. Instead, the Ninevites gladly received Jonah’s prophecy and repented and received mercy and forgiveness of God. Jonah’s generation was not the time for their judgment. Later is another story. Later Zephaniah prophesied their destruction [Zeph.2:4-15]; and then the prophet Nahum describe their complete and final destruction.

“And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.”

Romans 8:28 (ESV)

Elijah, after defeating the prophets of Baal, fled from Jezebel who put a bounty on his head. He was also angry and dejected. But it is God’s patience and tenderness that restores him.

[James 1] is also clear about God’s innocence and sovereign wisdom.

Scriptural evidence shows that God does not invite you to be angry at Him. It is our lack of understanding of the fuller picture that unjustly directs anger and blame towards God of perfection and holiness. However, it is also abundantly clear, that He allows it for a time because He is gentle and merciful. But since it’s not good or right for us to stay in that anger towards Him, He also provides trust and faith for us to understand [Rom.8:28] and overcome [1Cor.10:13] eventually. In the end, we find greater resolution in the deeper and more profound faith based on the character of God.

QUESTION 2.

THE CULTURE OF '“STIRRING” OR “SHIPPING” IS SOMETHING THAT I HAVE FOUND QUITE PROMINENT IN CHURCHES (INCLUDING HCC) AND MINISTRIES. THIS CULTURE CAN BE EXTREMELY UNHELPFUL AND IN SOME CASES MAY DRIVE BROTHERS AND SISTERS AWAY FROM PLATONIC BONDING, SO HOW CAN WE AS A CHURCH AND INDIVIDUALS ADDRESS THIS?

This was a fun question. I wondered with a few others what “stirring” and “shipping” could possibly mean. From the context of the question, and gathering from several contributing opinions, I take it to mean “setting people up for dating and potential marriage.”

Well, you’re right. It does happen in churches, and it can be unhelpful—extremely even. And particularly negative is when heightened mode of these activities drive a wedge between godly, brotherly/sisterly “phileo” relationships. I do agree with you and grieve over this last thing in particular. So, how do we address this? Well, in a few eudaemonistic ways, like much of proverbs. Divine wisdom is needed for when and how we apply several related principles and understandings for maximum happy result. So, pray and seek the Spirit’s guidance as we consider the following.

Setting up young people and providing wisdom, insight, opinions both for and against certain unions is what happens in communities—in any society. After all, we don’t all live in individual islands. Church, where people gather, is a community; and HCC happens to have a lot of young singles. Community input, especially from godly Christian folks is, can be, a good thing. And yes, too much is too much. And yes, sometimes, even “collective wisdom” can get things wrong. But the record shows that sometimes we also get it right, by God’s grace!

“We are collectively responsibly for the culture around us.”

In a bigger picture, while some are annoyed by all the “stirring”, some might actually wonder why there is no stirring around them?? This is a delicate dance that started since the very beginning.

We are collectively responsible for the culture around us. But also, we are not helpless victims. We can speak into it, as well as stand up to it graciously. Sometimes, it’s great fun to consider the exciting prospects; but sometimes we just need to say ‘no’ and ‘not now’ and ‘not for awhile’. At any given point, what you think and feel may not be the same as everybody else’s. If it were, then shifting the collective culture would be a swift process. Because every individual is on a different schedule, one mode does not rule fair for everyone. You individually have a choice and can make a difference. 

Sometimes we just need to say, “Let’s just enjoy the godly fellowship of all people regardless of gender, age, and other differences. Let’s celebrate the common union in Christ!” And sometimes we don’t need to say anything at all, and just do it. But sometimes, it’s okay to “stir” as the Spirit leads, as long as the intention is honorable before God, that it isn’t to stir trouble or to get your nose where it does not belong.

-

(Questions presented on this page have been edited for length and clarity.)

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 14: Imperfect Humans, a Perfect God

A load of information in this episode! This month, we explore how imperfect humans can become part of a perfect God, as well as how we should approach investment decisions as a Christian.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

IN MANY BIBLE VERSES, IT IS SAID THAT HUMANS WILL “BE IN GOD” OR "WILL BE “ONE WITH GOD”. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE FOR IMPERFECT HUMANS TO BECOME PART OF A PERECT BEING? SHOULD THESE VERSES BE TAKEN LITERALLY?

We can take all biblical passages “literally”. But to be fair, we need to apply appropriate literary method for interpretation fitting the context. Again, context is supremely important. “Literally” has often come to mean “simplistically” or “woodenly”, but not all communications are of one type, whether written or verbal. So, rather than hearing the way we are determined to hear, we need to seek to understand both the text and the author’s intent in order to arrive at the meaning.

21 that they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 22 The glory that you have given me I have given to them, that they may be one even as we are one, 23 I in them and you in me, that they may become perfectly one, so that the world may know that you sent me and loved them even as you loved me.

John 17:21-23 (ESV)

The preposition to be “in” or “with” can mean vastly different things in various different contexts depending on the nature of the object. People can be “in” a box or “in” a relationship with another person, but a pencil probably can’t be in a relationship. The main difference is that people and objects are different, but just as vast is the difference between people and their Maker. We might say that God’s relationship with mankind is condescending, but not have any intent to insult or belittle. God, as a supreme being, has to speak to us on our level, in ways that are common for us to understand; but this does not mean He is equal with us. In the Bible’s redemptive context, Jesus saves us by “hiding” us in His righteousness. He covers our imperfection with His perfection, which is the idea behind “atonement”. Like Noah and the animals in the ark, if we weren’t “in” Jesus, we wouldn’t be spared of God’s judgment. Our “oneness” with Christ is the result of His redemptive mercy.

QUESTION 2.

HAVING RECENTLY BECOME A CHRISTIAN I AM LOST AS TO HOW I SHOULD BE NAVIGATING CERTAIN INVESTING DECISIONS RELATED TO COMPANIES OPERATING IN POTENTIALLY MORALLY PROBLEMATIC INDUSTRIES. ARE THESE INDUSTRIES A COMPLETE NO-GO? IF I ALREADY HAVE FUNDS INVESTED IN THESE INDUSTRIES DO I HAVE TO SELL MY INVESTMENTS?

Very interesting question! I would have a think about the word to “invest” holistically. Etymologically, the word comes from a verb to be “clothed”, or to wear something. In a way it’s to put on a title, a rank or to add to your identity. Of course today, investment is much more about the money and numbers, as in ROI. But it’s not uncommon for investors to be personally involved in the multi-faceted aspects of the company, to make thoughtful selections that uphold their values and vision. After all, profit is only one of the many factors in investing.

Money is a tool, and depending on what you’re really after and the full-scope of your interest, the object of your investment can either support or contradict your vision and value. [Romans 12:1] tells the believers to present their bodies (whole lives) as “as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship.” So, it makes sense for a believer to be asking what is “holy and acceptable to God” even in your investment choice. Upon creation, we were commissioned to work for the thriving of civilization [Gen.1:28-30] and to propagate life.

28 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” 29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. 30 And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so.

Genesis 1:28-30 (ESV)

After the Fall, the progress of redemption runs parallel to restoration of the original cultural mandate, even though it won’t be perfectly achieved until the glorious return of Christ. For now, we have tremendous freedom in life choices as redeemed people [Rom.14]; but we’re told this liberty is to build-up the Kingdom of God [1Cor.10:23-33]. Lastly, it’s important to protect your own conscience in order to not quench the spirit’s fire. I call it the youth problem when the concern is around “how to avoid getting into trouble” instead of pursuing what is clearly the “best practice”.

-

(Questions presented on this page have been edited for length and clarity.)

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 13: Godly Anger and Ungodly Death

Happy new year! Thank you to all the submissions so far. We are slowly working through each questions and hope to resolve any burning questions you may have.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

WHY DOES IT SOMETIMES SEEM LIKE GOD CANNOT CONTROL HIS ANGER? WE READ IN PSALM 78 THAT HE FED THE PEOPLE, BUT HE ALSO KILLED THE STRONGEST OF THEM BECAUSE HE WAS ANGRY.

Psalm 78 is a brief summary that chronicles the patience of God in Israel’s history. But also, [vv.32-34] mentions the judgement. Of course, what summary lacks by the nature of its brevity is the long and detailed accounts of God’s long-suffering and long-patience. If, however, we actually read through the actual accounts, and if we can dare to imagine the full scope of the actual events from God’s perspective and experience, we are likely to be convinced that God is more patient than any human can ever be. Moreover, as the Creator, He is certainly justified to take those actions. Especially when we read on the never-ending repetitive cycle of sin, betrayal, and the sheer evil, we find that we quickly lose patience over humanity long before God ever does, and wonder why He puts up with the people the way He does.

The perception that God is quick to anger is discounting the context of human unfaithfulness and sinfulness. It’s like being a blind and foolish judge who completely ignores the crimes of the perpetrator. Instead, the faithful observers will testify (as in Psalm 86:15), “You, O Lord, are a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abundant in lovingkindness and truth, and others like it [Exo.34:6; Num.14:18; 2Pet.3:15].

The Lord is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love, forgiving iniquity and transgression, but he will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, to the third and the fourth generation.

Numbers 14:18 (ESV)

As sentient beings, we are prone to wonder about our own value, as the psalmist asks, “What is man that you are mindful of him?” [Psa.8:4a]. But to our pleasant surprise, we discover throughout the Scriptures that God values us far more than we imagine or deserve. In spite of constant rebellion and betrayal, God continue to pursue His people, and ultimately sacrifices His own Son to save us [John 3:11-21].

QUESTION 2.

IN ROMANS 5:6, IT SAYS CHRIST DIED FOR THE ‘UNGODLY’. WITH THE THEORY OF PREDESTINATION IN MIND, AM I CORRECT TO ASSUME THAT THIS WORD' ‘UNGODLY’ DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PEOPLE THAT GOD HAS NOT ELECTED?

In this context, the description of “ungodly” is, on one hand, referring specifically to the elect for whom Christ died for, but also as a way to compare their equal “ungodly” status as compared to all fallen people.

For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly.

Romans 5:6 (ESV)

Rather than highlighting the difference, it highlights the equal undeserved and fallen status prior to justification. It emphasises the point of “unconditional election,” more so than “limited atonement” in the scheme of 5-points of TULIP associated with Calvinism.

-

(Questions have been edited for length and clarity.)

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 12: Preparing Our Hearts for Spiritual Growth and Marriage

In case you missed it, Ask Pastor Jim Anything episodes will now be released on a monthly basis. In this episode, we’ll be assessing the criteria for spiritual growth, as well as assessing when we feel we are ready to date and get married.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

WHAT IS THE CRITERIA TO ASSESS SPIRITUAL GROWTH? HOW DO YOU KNOW YOU ARE NOT GROWING?

For such a “big picture” question, it’s helpful to consider Prof. John Frame’s “tri-perspectivalistic” approach. You can read much more about it in his books The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God and his Systematic Theology. Now to answer your question simply, there are three areas to “triangulate” and focus upon: theology, doxology and practice. Consider these a “three-legged stool” where the strength and the benefit of each are derived from the support of the other two.

First is theology. But this is not necessarily academic or institutional knowledge. It’s not about having thick books in your library or paying for expensive degrees and certificates. It’s about knowing God’s Word, the Scriptures, and yes, other books and studying anything to aid your knowledge of God’s Word can be helpful.  Knowing God and His Word is organic and systematic, just like getting to know another person. Over time we expect to grow relationally, but even in terms of actual quantifiable knowledge bits, as information, facts and data, you do amass them over the same time. According to God’s own revelation [Deut.29:29], it is impossible to grow in relationship with God apart from knowing Him according to His given Word of Scriptures, which we now have in the form of the Bible.

The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law.

Deuteronomy 29:29 (ESV)

But they are 66 distinct books compiled over thousands of years from various situations and perspectives, all in order to give us a singular message in multi-dimensional, technicolor tour de force. So, my question is, do you know God’s Word? How robustly are you progressing in your knowledge? Consider all these areas:

• Narratives (who, when, where, what, how),

• Systematic theology (topical and doctrinal categories),

• Biblical theology (organic progression of redemptive history), and

• Historical theology (progression of all these knowledge and their works by church and human teachers and authors).

This knowledge of God’s Word forms your “normative” by which all other things stand. And no matter how much we dig to mine the riches of His Word, we will discover that we are less than moles before Mt. Everest. 

Practical advice: Read the Bible. And read anything that can help you understand the Bible.

Second is doxology, which is in essence your heart of worship, because to know God is to worship Him and love Him. Without these, even the most informed scholars are empty of true knowledge of God. On the other hand, if someone claims to love God and feel ecstatic about Him, but do not know much about His Word, then all those feelings and outer fussing are empty of substance, like a “dog and pony show” instead of a real circus with elephants, lions and tigers! The worship of God is not simply how we feel about God. It is so much more. In fact, such desire for personal inspiration and positive uplifting spirit is the last thing on your mind when you truly know God. The knowledge of the Holy causes you to think of yourself last and the least. When the subject of theology becomes the object of worship, you simply fall prostrate and worship in holy reverence and inexplicable joy. However, our God of the Bible is also gentle and intimate and personal. He walks us through life as we worship Him. Our worship is not limited in some temple or certain time [1Cor.10:31; Col.2:16].

So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.

1 Corinthians 10:31 (ESV)

Worship is all encompassing. It is corporate and personal. Worship empowers life within us and give us love and courage and purpose beyond our own means. Worship melts away all problems and frustrations, and sets our heart on eternal and heavenly matters. Worship walks us through martyrdom, and allow us to face earthly jeers and persecution. Worship sets our hearts on the singular object of our love, our Saviour and Lord, the husband of the church. Worship is the natural response of knowing God for a converted soul. 

Practical advice: Pick up a copy of “The Valley of Vision” (ed. Arthur Bennett) to learn how to pray and meditate as a Christian. And never compromise your Sabbath (not legally speaking).

Third and lastly, the practice of God’s Word is in essence applying what we know of God and His will “on earth as it is in heaven” [Matt.6:10]. How do we fulfill His commands and purpose in this life through the medium of our own lives? Certain applicational matters are simply given to us in forms of commands and instructions, but to wisely prioritise and balance all applicational objectives take lifetime to learn. But the goal is not to master various applications, but to simply obey the Lord! Like theology and doxology (worship), even the application ought to be entirely God-centered. If our ministry is simply to serve others or to receive approvals and commendations from others to fulfill our own emotional needs, we will soon burn-out or easily become misdirected. Our ministry is for God and by God as we become His own bodily instruments. Christ is our Head and we are His body [Eph.5:23; 1Cor.12:27-31; Eph.4:11-16]. Therefore, the believers ought to coordinate together our services as a visible church.

If our ministry is simply to serve others or to receive approvals and commendations from others to fulfill our own emotional needs, we will soon burn-out or easily become misdirected.

But also, everything we do outside the church, our work in the marketplace and our family life, and even when we are entirely alone where no one is watching, we minister unto Him who is our One Audience. When we are captive to our Lord, there is not one place in our lives that we can claim as exclusively ours and not surrendered to Him. So, no matter how long or how much you think you served God, if it was indeed for Him, it is impossible to say enough. This is not “high and lofty knowledge”. It is basic Lordship servitude for one whose life has been redeemed from Hell to Glory.

Practice advice: Submit to your church and serve with others. Continue the God-ward ministry wherever you go (work, home, alone, etc.)

To sum, if you’re progressing well in the above three areas, you are growing well spiritually. As you can see, each area can have myriads of creative applicational avenues, but those are the basic frameworks, the basic foundational ideas that you can use to pursue theology, doxology and practice of Christian maturity. 

If you want to read more about Prof. Frame’s triperspectivalism, you can get a taste of it in his short primer article here.

QUESTION 2.

I OFTEN GET ADVICE WITHIN CHRISTIAN CIRCLES TO ‘ONLY START DATING WHEN YOU ARE READY TO GET MARRIED’. HOWEVER, THERE ARE A LOT OF GREY AREAS TO NAVIGATE. CAN YOU GIVE SOME INDICATORS ARE THE BEST WAY TO DISCERN?

I agree with that advice. But to qualify my agreement, I have to specify what I mean by “ready to be married.” Does it mean having all the financial means for the wedding, honeymoon location picked out, and having set up a home for your newly married life?  Does it mean to know the other person so completely as to be able to say “yes” if the proposal happened the next minute? Having the dress and the songs picked out? Obviously not. Or perhaps that wasn’t so obvious to you. ;)

The true readiness has to do with the right understanding of marriage and dating for the purpose of marriage. In other words, you need to start with the end in mind. But you can’t start if you don’t know what that “end game” looks like. Also, by this “end” I don’t mean a fixed demand of a certain external outcome. I mean the principles that will serve as a lasting bedrock for your marriage. What are those things? I’ll just mention (3) things.

One. You need to understand that marriage was and is God’s original idea. It is a part of God’s creation ordinance for human flourishing, to establish family and society. Much of God’s good design and intent is now defaced by sin and rebellious ideas that violate this gift. But you must insist on God’s way; and not be persuaded in any other way. Marriage is between one man and one woman! This would naturally disqualify all other so-called relationships.

Two. You need to understand that while there are all kinds of marriages out there, including Christians who become entangled in very un-Christian relationships, a true Christian marriage is between two committed Christians who dedicate their relationship and lives entirely to Christ. Just because “church-goers” marry, that doesn’t mean they will have a Christian marriage. It takes conscious coordination of two disciples of Jesus to make a Christian marriage.

Three. You need to understand that mature people make good marriages. Maturity also means selfless and responsible character, and not prone to demands and temperamental fits. Mature people have a strong sense of direction in life, a vision if you will (at least in principle if not specific paths). But these character traits cannot be detected from across the room, or overnight. Handsome/pretty face and hot body do not tell you who is “ready” for the demanding journey in life-partnership. You must be willing to patiently do your research before jumping in. More importantly, you must be willing to be that person for your future mate. These all take patience to acquire. And patience requires time and LOTS of prayer.

So there. If you can discern these three things, if you know your “end-game,” you are ready to date for marriage!

I also recommend reading Tim & Kathy Keller’s “The Meaning of Marriage”. This is must-read for my premarital counselling couples.

-

(Questions have been edited for length and clarity.)

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 11: Mission-Minded - Helpful or Harmful?

This episode will be focusing on missions, a core value of Harbour City Church. We’ll be looking at the good and bad sides to short-term missions, as well as how we as a church decide where to send our members on our mission trips.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

THERE’S A LOT OF CONTROVERSY AROUND SHORT-TERM MISSIONS, AND WHETHER THEY HARM MORE THAN THEY HELP. WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ON THIS?

I have now been going as well as facilitating short-term missions for over 30 years. During these years, I have seen plenty of negative elements as well as plenty of wonderful results. By this, I don’t mean different perspectives or experiences people may have had on the same trip or similar trips where individual opinions differ for inter-personal reasons. I will try to focus on what are hopefully objective criteria. There is also a book called “When Helping Hurts” by Corbett, Fikkert and Perkins. This book outlines in great detail many problems and controversies mainly around poverty alleviation, but they are relevant for short-term missions as well.

Some negatives: 

• Missions that focus on the goer more than the impact on the field are generally off-based and bound to make many mistakes- When churches and individuals have personal wants and agendas for various reasons, they can trample and disrupt the works of the long-term missionaries, leave negative footprints and become poor witnesses. These poor reasons may be for exotic travel experience, escapism, spiritual merit, church promotion, and host of others. 

• Poor missiological training causes goers to miss many learning opportunities before going, on the field, and even after they return as they reflect, testify and consider future possibilities. Good missiological training includes both academic and doxological discipline, including lots of prayers. 

• Of course, there is also the matter of team and logistics management as well. You can easily imagine how many things can go wrong when international travel is poorly managed for a careless group. 

• Lastly, creating unreasonable expectations or long-term dependency, whether unsustainable or actually sustained, often hurt the mission of the Kingdom.

Now the positives: 

• When done right, short-term missions are like water to parched ground and a good push of momentum for the long-term missionaries and their works. So, obviously, what you do should be based on what’s good for the mission field (Taking from the above negatives, the reverse effects). 

• Good short-term missions encourage and refresh the missionaries, and lend real help to the field work. 

• On top, a trip well done will transform the lives of the goers whether as an even more mature sender, or perhaps even be motivated to commit as long-term missionaries themselves. For all these good things to happen, there are many other ingredients that go in the recipe!

QUESTION 2.

HOW DOES OUR CHURCH DETERMINE WHERE TO GO FOR MISSIONS?

With the above things in mind for what makes a good short-term mission, over the years, a few other practical elements have also guided how we do short-term mission trips. This is true for both our university ministry (SOW) as well as for our church/HCC. In some ministries in the past, our leadership was scrambling from year to year as to where and to whom we should send our short-term teams. The results were a widely varied mixed bag of both good and bad in terms of connection with the missionary and fruitful ministry experiences. When things were bad, we were able to identify a number of incompatibility issues with the host-missionary, such as theology, ministry philosophy, strategy, personality dynamics, etc.. But even when things were good, we hardly stayed in touch long enough to find any meaningful traction throughout the year, nor for nurturing long-term vision together. In short, our short-term missions were disposable, one-time use trips; and this is not to take away from the lasting impact the Lord made on the individuals. However, organizationally speaking, I learned my lessons.

Therefore, I am pleased that we select our partner missionaries and fields based on all those criteria I mentioned above. On top, being a missionary myself with a particular organization (PCAmerican/MTW), many of those same values come “locked in” by our common association. Yes, we send our teams to other MTW and partner missionaries that I personally know and trust around the world. The best part is the ongoing relationship network, of whom some are actual close friends. This means, long after the trips are over, we can continue to nurture the relationship and vision together for years to come. 

It is our hope and prayer that through such solid support systems, HCC will soon launch long-term missionaries out of our own congregation into other places!

-

(Questions have been edited for length and clarity.)

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 10: Revelation and Temptations

We’re back from our short break! This episode, we’ll be looking at how to interpret the book of Revelation and end times, as well as how God tests us.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

HOW DO WE INTERPRET THE BOOK OF REVELATION AND ALL THE CONSPIRACIES WE HEAR ABOUT THE END TIMES? I FEEL HESITANT ABOUT BRUSHING THINGS OFF AS SIMPLY A SYMBOL AS I WANT TO TAKE GOD’S WORD SERIOUSLY.

The Book of Revelation is a unique genre among the New Testament books. But there are also 17 other prophetic books in the Old Testament (Isaiah through Malachi) that shares the similar characteristics and interpretive challenges. Having this precedence means that Revelation isn’t entirely odd, and that we can utilize much of what we learn about interpreting O.T. prophetic literatures plus the added hindsight of much of the O.T. Prophesies having been fulfilled in history, such as the plight of the nation of Israel, and the first coming of the Messiah-Saviour, Jesus Christ. We even see the recurrence of similar expressions and characters reintroduced in the N.T. prophesy. However, we must pay close attention to the continuity and discontinuity along the spectrum of history since Revelation is certainly a latter revelation. Most importantly, we must understand the clear teachings of the gospel in the whole of the New Testament. 

One of the most important principles in interpreting the Bible is that “scriptures interpret scriptures”. This means that on any given topic or subject, the clearer passages help to interpret the less clear passages, while the latter adds or fill-in things that the prior may lack. In other words, we should not single-out curious or obscure passages, then let that be the central enquiry by which all other passages stand or fall. 

Revelation affirms what the rest of the N.T. teaches. In fact, they all affirm one another.

Obviously, so much more could be said about the book of Revelation, but I would summarize it as a “triumphant capitulation of the gospel reality.” In fact, there are cycles of various gospel elements told and retold through series of visions as given to Apostle John. But visions are similar to dreams in that they are dynamic in expression even though the reality they portray are quite straight forward. We see symbolic themes of imageries, numbers and characters, much like in the O.T. prophesies, but they have real life counterpart in the repeated teachings of the gospel, which is the life-death-resurrection-ascension-return of Jesus Christ. Therefore, we need to remember that the straight teachings of the gospel inform Revelation and not the other way around. Revelation affirms what the rest of the N.T. teaches. In fact, they all affirm one another.

As for the sensationalism incited by fictions and movies, they are merely capitalizing on the highly evocative nature of the vision imageries in Revelation, plus the gravity associated with the biblical scriptures. Most often they only amount to cheap entertainment that has very little to do with the actual biblical-gospel message.

For more detailed studies, I would recommend the following three commentaries and monograms: “More than a Conquerors” by William Hendriksen; “Triumph of the Lamb” by Dennis Johnson; and a much more technical and scholarly commentary on Revelation by Greg Beale in the New International Greek Testament Commentary (NIGTC) series .

QUESTION 2.

GOD DOESN’T TEMPT US, BUT IS IT RIGHT TO SAY THAT GOD TESTS OUR FAITH? WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEING TESTED AND BEING TEMPTED?

Yes, there certain is a distinction between testing and tempting. The difference lies in the intention. Testing merely proves what is or isn’t there, whereas temptation is laid on for a desire to see someone fall as victim to the temptation. Testing is neutral, but tempting is sinister.

The bible clearly states that God does not tempt [James 1:13-15], but that He does test [Psalm 26:2; Jer.17:10; 1Thess.2:4; 1Peter 1:6-7; etc.] our faith and faithfulness. However, the ultimate test is reserved for the final judgement where all things will be laid bare and accounted for [1Cor.3:13-15].

Each one’s work will become manifest, for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work that anyone has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. If anyone’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.

1 Corinthians 3:13-15 (ESV)

As for us, we should not test God [Matthew 4:7] as if we are above Him; but instead, we should test ourselves [2Cor.13:5] to see where we stand in the faith or not.

-

(Questions have been edited for length and clarity.)

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 9: The Crucifixion and the Asian Church

Thanks to everyone who has been sending through questions. This week, we’ll be looking at how we can rely on God as we navigate the digital nature of our society and as we continue to sin.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

I UNDERSTAND THAT DURING THE CRUCIFIXION, GOD THE FATHER WAS POURING OUT HIS WRATH ON GOD THE SON. THEIR ROLES ARE VERY EVIDENT IN THE BIBLE, BUT I STRUGGLE TO UNDERSTAND THE ROLE OF GOD THE SPIRIT DURING THIS TIME. WHAT WAS THE ROLE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT DURING THE CRUCIFIXION?

We speak of God in two equally true terms:  unity and trinity; trinity and unity.  The three persons of our one God-being are always there together in harmony whether we can discern their parts or not.  According to the dominant role of the Holy Spirit, which is to apply the work of Christ according to the Father’s plan into the hearts and lives of people, the Spirit was there to work faith among the onlookers of the crucifixion [John 16:8-10], like the Centurion who commented, “Truly, this was the Son of God!” [Matt.27:54]. 

8 And when he comes, he will convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment: 9 concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; 10 concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no longer;

John 16:8-10 (ESV)

He was also comforting the grieving hearts of Mary and the disciples, and reminding them of Jesus’ words [John 14:26-27].  Also, as God, the H.S. always was, and always will be; but particularly during the gospel age, until the return of the Lord Jesus, the H.S. is intimately present with the church, the believers [John 14].

Also, check out the Athanasian's Creed & Nicene Creed here.

QUESTION 2.

HOW HAS ASIAN CULTURE AND TRADITION BOTH BENEFITED AND BEEN TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE CHURCH?

Ooh~  Juicy question!  I think many Asian-Australian/American church leaders have a lot to say about this, all having lived through them.

First, the bad news (the “detriments”):

Asians are extremely pragmatic—probably because we are from old worlds with many ups and downs through our colorful, painful battle-scarred history.  We had to survive!  So, “what works” is “what matters.”  Problem is, faith/spiritual matters are not always practical—especially doctrinal and theological orthodoxy.  So, the Asian churches/Christians tend to be too pragmatic for their own good, prioritizing questions like, “What grows the church?  What draws people?  What’s popular?  What’s hot?”  And they have been known to compromise biblical truths and priorities to meet these demands.

Asians are also materialistic.  Of course, all people/races are materialistic, but most Asians are the “new-money” people, so they tend to be a tad tacky and cheesy with their overt desires and flaunting of money.  Our rich uncles are really annoying and embarrassing!  These things need to be overcome by the understanding of supreme ownership and authority of God’s sovereignty, that it is He who give and takes away.  Asian Christians need better understanding of Christian stewardship vs. human ownership attached to their sense of identity and idolatry.

Asians are highly spiritual in a superstitious way, familiar from our past shamanism and animism, and even some irrational syncretism of Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism.  A little bit from here and a little from there.  Such confusing spiritual guessing works must be entirely replaced with biblical truths by the renewing of the mind [Rom.12:1], and putting new wine in a new wineskin [Matt.9:14-17].

New to the Christian faith, and bearing lots of baggage from our past, we are a bit “desperate” as a people-group, if I may say that about many different Asian nationals and varied cultures within.  This is a broad-brush stroke.  From here, we need to move on to “balance, control, accuracy and intentional potency” to execute our mission on earth as Christ’s church.

Now, the good stuff—and there are many!

Asians are survivors!  We ain’t going nowhere!!  M-hm~!  There’s a reason why Asians are the biggest race group on planet Earth!  This tenacity to survive has great use in the perseverance of God’s church to the very end.  This may be audacious, but call it a foregone conclusion that the Asian churches will be around to the end, even though we are relatively new to the Kingdom race.  The question is, are we a “problem” that doesn’t go away, or “solution”?  I believe in these last days, we are part of the great solution to completing the Great Commission mandate [Matt.28:19-20].

19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”

Matthew 28:19-20 (ESV)

Asians are hard-working and sacrificial.  Need I say more?  Does this remark require some justification beyond what is already self-evident?  Don’t our parents work 50-70hrs a week, AND attend prayer meetings every morning at 5:30AM?  Even the “drive” of the church in these last days is significantly fueled by the participation of the Asian churches.  Asians pray hard, give hard, serve hard, and know how to achieve great thing on a shoestring budget.

However, there is sharp decline amongst the 2nd generation born and living in Western culture.  Even though only one generation away, to these 2nd/3rd gens, the days of eking and scratching a living seem like distant past.  We are quickly infected with existential quandaries because we are surrounded by ease of living.  Unlike the 1st generation, we are not desperate enough!

However, our collectivity must be sanctified for holy and biblical purposes, because if directed in a secular way, it will only result in social conformity

Asians are collective people, and guard our relationships with vigilance.  Again, look at the way we survive.  When applied to church, it can be a very good thing.  However, our collectivity must be sanctified for holy and biblical purposes, because if directed in a secular way, it will only result in social conformity.  As the Lord’s church, Asians saints excel in accountability, support and cooperation.

-

(Questions have been edited for length and clarity.)

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 8: Relying on God through Anxiety and Contemporary Society

Thanks to everyone who has been sending through questions. This week, we’ll be looking at how we can rely on God as we navigate the digital nature of our society and as we continue to sin.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

WE CURRENTLY LIVE IN A DIGITAL AGE THAT IS OVERLY DEPENDENT OF VARIOUS SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. AS A CHRISTIAN, WHAT IS THE BEST ATTITUDE TO HAVE TOWARDS THESE, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT IS ALREADY DEEPLY INTEGRATED INTO OUR DAY TO DAY LIVES?

I’ll say something very obvious, but important to keep in mind.  Platform is neutral; it’s what we do on it that matters.  See, you knew that.  It’s also about control.  Just like anything in life and market economy, there are producers and consumers, and sellers and buyers.  But consumers and buyers are not powerless as they can make choices that affect not only themselves, but also the behavior of the producers and sellers of online content.  Some of us may even be content producers and purveyors.

Here are some things we can think about and even do: (1) Know that you have the on/off switch at your fingertip.  You are not helpless.  You have as much control and potency as anyone else.  From time to time, turn your devices off and go for a walk.  Face physical reality, breath in fresh air, and touch the ground you live on, then gain some perspective on your online life/behavior pattern.  (2) As with any products and information before the digital age, know that you can discern and discriminate the contents online.  You are not forced to consume, like drinking water out of a fire hydrant.  (3) As a Christian, know that God alone still has the “words of eternal life” [John 6:68], and that nothing is as powerful.  Therefore, let the gospel and God’s Word dominate and wash over you through many means (Bible reading, Christian books, podcast, apps, church fellowship, bible studies, discipleship, evangelism, etc.), and limit the consumption of social media accordingly (I won’t recommend a concrete number here).

Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life

John 6:68 (ESV)

Sometimes we like to feign helplessness and lack of control because then we think we can blame something or somebody else.  No!  You are responsible for your own earthly actions at all times, and God will hold you accountable.  But also, with God’s eternal grace, there is moment by moment forgiveness, love affirmation, and power to overcome our sin and problems.  People are not always gracious, but God is, so we always face forward every moment and every new day!

Also, check out this link here.

QUESTION 2.

I’M SO DEATHLY AFRAID BECAUSE I BELIEVE I HAVE COMMITTED THE UNFORGIVABLE SIN, BLASPHEMY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. I WAS VERY ANGRY ONE DAY AND QUESTIONED HOW I CAN TELL OTHERS GOD HELPS THEM WHEN HE CANNOT HELP ME. I’M SO SCARED OF AN ETERNITY WITHOUT JESUS BUT I FEEL THERE IS NO LONGER A POINT IN ME LIVING IF I AM DAMMED FOR ETERNITY.

If you actually care about what Jesus says and care about offending Him, then it may indicate that you also believe in Jesus and His gospel, which is the life-death-resurrection-ascension-return testimony.  

Yes, Jesus does say in [Matthew 12:30-32]

“30 Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters. 31 Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. 32 And whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.”  

Matthew 12:30-32 (ESV)

But this “blasphemy” and “speaking” against the Holy Spirit has to do with rejecting the gospel testimony of the Holy Spirit, which in essence is unbelief.  It is only unbelief in the gospel of Christ which is unforgivable, because the gospel requires repentance of sin and trust in Jesus [Mark 1:15; Matt.16:24].  “Speaking out” words of faith is counter to unbelief according to [Rom.10:9-10] –

“9 because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved.”

Romans 10:9-10 (ESV)

So, do not be afraid.  God of grace and patience will not “zap” you to condemnation because of a moment’s anger and hard words.  In the arc of life, you will find that your faith, even in inconsistent and feeble form, is an indication that God has placed His grace on you.

-

(Questions have been edited for length and clarity.)

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 7: Profound Love & Profound Books

Thanks for sending through your questions. This week, we’ll be looking at how to love those who may not reciprocate, and Pastor Jim dives into a few of his favourite Christian reads.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

I KNOW WE OFTEN TALK ABOUT LOVING BROTHERS AND SISTERS WHO I DON’T WANT TO LOVE, BUT HOW DO I LOVE BROTHERS AND SISTERS WHO DON’T LOVE ME?

Jesus came to His own, yet His own did not recognize Him [John 1:10-11].  He first loved us while we were still sinners and enemies of God, and didn’t love Him back [Rom.5:8].  Apart from following Christ’s example, and sourcing His love, it would be impossible to love someone who do not reciprocate our love.  This sort of unconditional love is most wonderfully and commonly displayed by parents toward their children, but even they are not perfect.  Only Jesus perfectly loved His enemies.

Having said the above, the practicality of “loving someone” is often misunderstood as good times and fuzzy feelings, when in reality, the more profound love can be expressed through patience, kindness, respect and grace.  “Loving your brothers and sisters” do not necessarily mean expecting to be best friends with every member of the church.  There will always be varying degree of connection with various members of the church, but no matter how close or distant, we can always practice love and grace of Christ.

QUESTION 2.

WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR FAVOURITE CHRISTIAN BOOKS AND AUTHORS?

This is a hard question for a pastor who lives with many books and authors.  Some are important works for understanding theology because of their contribution to development of our understanding of God and Scriptures.  Others are valued for their effectiveness to communicate, both stylistically and for practicality.  It’s also difficult to divide strictly between these lines.  However, for the purpose of brevity, and serving the introductory nature of this list, I will keep the list fairly short.

These are some names of Christian authors with which you really can’t go too wrong, and their representative works:

• R. C. Sproul (The Holiness of God,  Knowing Scripture,  Chosen by God)

• J. I. Packer (Knowing God,  A Quest for Godliness,  Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God)

• C. S. Lewis (Mere Christianity,  Chronicles of Narnia,  The Screwtape Letters,  Surprised by Joy,  Etc)

• Michael Horton (Putting Amazing Back into Grace,  Introducing Covenant Theology,  Christless Christianity)

• Timothy Keller (The Reason for God, The Meaning of Marriage, The Prodigal God,  Counterfeit Gods,  Every Good Endeavour, The Freedom of Self-Forgetfulness,  Etc. etc. all)

• Jerry Bridges (Pursuit of Holiness, Transforming Grace)

• Oswald Chambers (My Utmost for His Highest)

These are some books not written by the above authors that you should pick up to read, because they are either classics or important today:

• St. Augustine (Confession,  City of God)

• John Bunyan (Pilgrim’s Progress,  Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners)

• Prayer book edited by Arthur Bennett (The Valley of Vision)

• The Institute of Christian Religion (John Calvin)

-

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 6: Guarding one's heart?

Thanks for sending through your questions. While we endeavour to answer all questions submitted, this week, we will be focusing on just one- what does it mean to guard our hearts?

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN WHEN PEOPLE SAY “GUARD YOUR HEART”? BOTH CONCEPTUALLY AND PRACTICALLY.

The expression to “guard your heart” comes from a few passages, but most prominently from [Prov.4:23]

Keep your heart with all vigilance,

for from it flow the springs of life.

Proverbs 4:23 (ESV)

If you heard other people say that expression, I can’t tell you what they meant by it.  You’ll have to ask them.  Often it’s used in dating or relationship with opposite sex, to not overly invest under uncertain terms.  But I suppose it can be used in many other contexts as well.

But the Bible mainly means to keep your heart free of bitterness, hardness, fatigue and all kinds of other sinful conditions that inhibits your ability to love and worship God.  The reason the heart needs to be guarded is because there are many factors that assault our emotion (heart) that causes us to react negatively.  But for the sake of our relationship with God, it is vitally important that our hearts remain soft, sensitive, joyful, and resilient in order to engage with the Holy Spirit in  real, meaningful and powerful ways

-

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 5: Free will and the difference between denominations

We’d like to take a moment to thank everyone for submitting questions and following our series so far. This episode, we’ll be talking about how Free Will affects our faith, as well as the differences between the Presbyterian denomination compared to other denominations. Some questions have been shortened for clarity, but if you would like to know the full question please do not hesitate to reach out!

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

HOW DOES ‘FREE WILL’ AFFECT MY FAITH? SOMETIMES I QUESTION, “DO I CHOOSE GOD OR DOES GOD CHOOSE ME?”. SO, HOW DOES ‘OUR CHOICES’ DIFFER FROM THE ‘PRE-DESTINED’ OR ‘CHOSEN’ LIFE DECISIONS FROM GOD?

There is water, then there’s water depth.  I can drink water, swim in it, but beyond certain lung-crushing depth, I simply cannot survive—let alone enjoy a variety of willful activities.  (Fun fact: the world record for “no limits free-diving" is 214 meters/702 feet.  Mariana Trench is 11,034 meters/36,200 feet deep. Most average divers do not go beyond 15 meters/50 feet—and that’s with breathing apparatuses.)  Our consciousness of and exercise of our “free will” is the same.  On a certain level, we seem to freely exercise our will every which way we please.  Then as other people and circumstances are involved, such exercise of our will becomes more constrained, like we can’t do everything we want to do, when we want to, the way we want them.  Then there is another level where our nature, subconsciousness, deep character, deep disposition and inner spiritual condition are so “hard wired” that they are for all practical purpose, beyond our control.  Then there’s God!  God freely acts on all levels both seen and unseen.

The artificial juxtaposition between “our free will” vs. God’s will is a false assumption of our being on the same plane as God.  This is an audaciously low view of God, as well as an unattainably high view of ourselves.  But also, it does tremendous disservice to ourselves by unnecessarily constraining our activities on the only level we can manage whether in thoughts or action.  Within our immediate sphere of influence, in this limited context, we are indeed “free”.  But can we do anything like God can?  No.  But we are helped by being aware of God’s original design for us, the fallenness of all creation while retaining some of the original goodness, and God’s redemptive plan as well as the benefits the Redeemer (Jesus) brings.  

Now to directly answer your questions: When you choose God, it is because on a level too deep and mysterious for you to fathom or sense, God has first chosen you.  It is God who initiates, sustains and completes our salvation [Phil.1:6; Heb.12:2]; but we consciously realize it and act on it at some point in time.  If God does not “regenerate” our dead spirit and make it come alive [Eph.2:4], we simply lack the faculty and desire to choose God.  To a dying soul, the “good news” of Jesus is a foolish proposition [1Cor.1:18], and the whole thing will smell like stench of death [2Cor.2:16].  But the opposite is also true.  When the mercy and grace of God reaches out to us, we “see” His wisdom in the gospel, and it smells like sweet aroma of life.  Clash of these ideas happen only when philosophy is devoid of good theology.

QUESTION 2.

WHAT SEPaRATES THE PRESBYTERIAN DENOMINATION FROM OTHER DENOMINATIONS?

Presbyterians are “Reformed” in theology, and “elders-lead” in governing structure.  The name comes from a Greek word for “elders” (Gk. presbuteros).  The Presbyterianism is basically a Reformed church of Scotland which started in the 17th century under the leadership of John Knox.  It added the emphasis on specific polity (governing structure) where a congregation is to be lead by a group of ruling and teaching elders known as the “session.”  Presbyterianism eventually spread to other parts as the new worlds were discovered post 16th Century (America, Australia, etc.) and later through missional works.

What “Reformed faith” is requires more explanation.  But in short, it highlights absolute sovereignty of God in all things, including our salvation.  The finer points of this theology was refined in the decades following the Protestant Reformation during a period and arrangement known as “Magisterial Reformation,” especially around leaders such as John Calvin, Theodore Beza, Philip Melanchthon, Heinrich Bullinger, Huldrych Zwingli, Martin Bucer, etc..

Today, there are several Presbyterian denominations in countries like Australia, U.S., N.Z., S. Korea, and others.  But they are mainly distinguished by the liberal ones who have compromised much of the classic theological tenets of their heritage (i.e. – PCUSA, PCNZ, Uniting*, etc.), and the conservative ones who continue to preserve the original theological tenets (PCAmerica, WPC, PCAustralia, GPC, etc.). 

*The Uniting church of Australia is a result of merger movement of the 3 former liberal** denominations of Presbyterian churches, Methodist churches, and Congregational churches. 

**The term “liberal” specifically refers to the loose or leveled-down view of the Bible as being not entirely or accurately the Word of God, and this affects all interpretive methods as well as applicational implications.  Conservative churches tend to believe that the Word of God (the Bible) as entirely trustworthy for salvation, and that it is error-free for all doctrinal guidance.

-

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 4: Growing the church in discerning leadership and community.

Thanks to all those who have submitted questions so far. This week’s episode looks into a couple common situations, specifically, struggles within the church community, and discerning who is fit to lead the church. If you would like to learn more about these answers, or have any follow-up questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

QUESTION 1.

I DON’T FEEL AT HOME AT CHURCH DESPITE TRYING TO GET INVOLVED WITH THE COMMUNITY. HOW DO I KNOW THAT THIS CHURCH ISN’T RIGHT FOR ME?

First of all, I am very sorry that you are feeling this way.  “Community” has many intangible and subjective aspects that we attach to it, from certain positive expectations to negative experiences we don’t want.  These are not unreasonable—most of the time.  But we need to consider multiple aspects.

Also, for the purpose of getting to the heart of the matter, I am going to assume that our legitimacy as a church is not in question here, especially in terms of biblical criteria.  So, I’m going to treat this as a question of “how to choose a local home-church amongst several/many sound options”.

Well, of course it is reasonable to want to feel “at home” at church.  I would imagine wanting spiritual fulfillment, emotional connection, great vision, exciting programs, good friends, fun times, help in times of need and want, ministry training, adequate facility, serving opportunities, and the list can go on and on and on…. But there are two questions to attach to these experiential longings.

• What are my priorities among many wants from a “home church”?  Since I can’t possibly “have it all” on this side of eternity, what are more important than others?

• What is my role or contribution in equipping our church with “that”, or see to it that the experience I long for is present at this church?  Or, do I expect all these things to be handed to me on a platter exactly as I expect it?

Another thing is that church, like own lives, go through seasons of changes.  People and various church components (building, programs, etc.) come and go; God providentially gives and takes them away.  So, then how do I navigate through these changes?  Do I shop and change around, or do I stay put in one place?  How do I manage my faith journey over the years?

While changing from one local church to another is not necessarily sinful in itself, one must consider all the thinking and heart and characters issues associated with the decision—especially because it invariably involved other people and relationships, or the lack thereof.  We must recognize our complicity in the lack of fulfillment—so this issue does not go on unaddressed.

These days “lack of community” is that one all-purpose expression to describe general discontent.  But generality does not get to the heart of the matter.  We must address specific issues, whats and whys.  And if Christians are to function as God intended through the crucible of the church, we must learn to stay in the pocket and work things out.

At the end of the day, unlike our biological family, a local church is nothing without mutual commitment to one another.  As long as “it” is a thing outside us, we will judge and be critical towards it, and our sinfulness will grow tire of it.  But if one has committed as a member, then that commitment should be more than a token gesture.  That membership commitment made before God should internalize church as your very own to love, cherish and nurture.  It is not some church out there, but it is yours.

Church is not a place to keep you happy.  It is a place to do life with you as you pursue Christ, to worship with you, to walk alongside you, and you alongside others, through thick and thin of this life.

QUESTION 2.

HOW DOES OUR CHURCH DETERMINE WHO IS FIT TO BE A LEADER OR ELDER?

A couple of years ago, specifically from December 2017 and until February 2019, while we were nominating, training and ordaining/electing elders, HCC has had many messages on what the Bible has to say about elders and their qualifications.  During that time we also went over the history and distinctives of a Presbyterian denomination.

The key passages come from [1Timothy 3] and [Titus 1], but there are many other relevant passages [1Peter 5:2-3, 5; Heb.13:17, Titus 2:1; 3:1; 1Tim.5:17-20; etc.]

All these verses speak to characteristics and qualities of Christian leaders.  But what separates elders from deacons is their ability to teach.  Elders must be able to teach the Word of God.

But also, at our church/denomination/tradition, we make a distinction between Ruling Elders (laity) and Teaching Elders.  In a way, to label “teaching” elders is a bit redundant.  But these are those that you’d typically know as pastors.  And because the main difference is the amount of professional attention required in teaching, the pastors are most often required to be trained through a reputable theological seminary with degrees of Masters of Divinity (M.Div.) and above.

-

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 3: Exploring church matters in marriage and salvation

In this week’s episode, we’ll start to dive into more difficult matters surrounding the church. If you would like to learn more about these answers, or have any follow-up questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

To check out last episode’s questions click here, and for Jim’s foreword on answering these questions click here.

-

Question 1.

Why do churches idolise ‘Marriage’ so much? In our Christian culture, we elevate marriage all the time. This also happens at our church and there’s been many cases where I’ve witnessed this.

This is a bit heavy-handed.  While the charge may be true since even our righteousness is tinged with sin on this side of eternity [Isa.64:6], to label “idolatry” on another beside ourselves is… a bit harsh.

Having said this, I do recognize the need to be sensitive when we celebrate and esteem even good things, because it may be a pressure point for others.  But also, we need to learn to rejoice with others for the blessings they have in Christ, even if it is not the same blessings as bestowed on us.  We need to share in the sorrows and the joys of others.

As for marriage itself, apart from those who are gifted with celibacy [1Cor.7:8-9], marriage and family-formation is the biblical/creation normative.  In fact, we are commanded to pursue this creation order [Gen.1:28] even after the Fall, all things being equal.  But by “pursuing”, I mean waiting on God’s timing, and being open to it as “normal/usual” expectation unless, as mentioned before, we sense God’s extraordinary gift of celibacy which is “long-term functional contentment”, which is not the same as situational singleness.  As non-celibacy-gifted individuals, we must manage our singleness well as part of our individual sanctification, which is to walk with Jesus each day with joy and contentment.

Also, we must observe that today’s society does not esteem marriage very much.  By this, I do not mean mere companionship, but everything that comes with marriage, such as parenting and the institution of family as social fabric.  Today, the popular and secular views on marriage is reduced to mere paper contract or glorified coupling, while families struggle to stay intact, and in many places the birth rate is lower than replacement rate.  I may go so far as to say that we don’t talk about and esteem marriage enough!

As for messages for and focus on the singles at our church, you may consider all things not explicitly addressing marriage and couples as messages for singles and individuals.  The topic does not have to be on “singleness” per se, to be a message for individual sanctification.  In fact, even the messages on marriages and couples are not simply about them at face value, but ultimately about Christ and the church, so they are still relevant for the sanctification of individual Christians.

For a young church of mostly singles, I believe we have consciously tried not to overly focus on the topics immediately relevant to our unique demographics, and mostly succeeded.  But I’m more than willing to hear out how we can improve; and even more to hear out how you’ve been personally affected.

Question 2.

Are Catholics considered Christians?

By their own label, and at a face-value, um… yes, kind of…. I prefer first to say “Yes,” but then add a caveat.

The “Protestants” broke away from the Roman Catholic church in the 16th Century precisely because the Roman church required “works-based salvation.”  The Reformers were absolutely convinced from the Scriptures that a man was saved by grace, and not by works [Eph.2:8-9; Rom.3:28; Gal.2:16, 3:11, 5:4].  This is a huge-difference, one that directly affects salvation/justification.  And it is not that the Protestants left the Catholic church; but that their leadership excommunicated those who saw differently and would not recant.  

Unfortunately, these differences remain even today.  The official doctrine of the Roman Catholic church (specifically in the documents drafted and reiterated in Trent and Vatican) still remain that one is saved by faith AND works, and not faith alone through grace.  Technically speaking, this is a big difference.  It raises the question of the sufficiency of Christ’s works and death on the cross.  If somehow on top of Christ’s works, we must add ours to be saved, how much is enough?  Won’t even our best works be impaired by sins and flaw?  

Fortunately, not all Catholics these days, or ever, are very aware of the official Catholic doctrines.  Some of them simply and truly rely on the grace of God through His Son, Jesus Christ.  For these, and minus many other man-made traditions that accumulated through the middle-ages (such as saint-veneration, purgatory, 7 sacraments, priestly absolution, etc.), I would like to hope for the best in their simple-faith in Jesus.

On the other hand, even for the Protestant evangelical Christians, many are not very clear about the doctrine of salvation.  “Woe” to them as individuals.  But they should be taught the right gospel out of the Scriptures week-in and week-out.

-

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 2: Reading and Re-Reading the Word

Thank you to everyone who has submitted questions so far. We’ve had an enjoyable time reading through these and are excited to share with you the answers throughout the next coming weeks. In this episode, Pastor Jim will be sharing his advice concerning reading & understanding the Word.

To check out last episode’s questions, as well as Jim’s foreword on answering these, click here.

-

Question 1.

How am I to read and study bible books that contain chapters of just listing names, like chronicles? I find it hard to see what God is trying to show me during these chapters.

You must be referring to genealogies and censuses.  And there are quite a few places where we find them. Each are for their own particular reasons and context, and therefore arranged accordingly.  Some seeming contradictions are actually different editorial emphases, and some individuals having multiple names to name a couple of challenges.  Some lists are used for credentialing, and some are for arguing a point.  There are many reasons and just as many ways to extract benefit in studying them.

But the most important “thread” is the line that connects to Jesus Christ, the Son of Abraham, Judah, King David, etc.

Still there are many “nuggets” to be gained along the way to Jesus as various characters within the list, and each editorial context of listing have unique Gospel points.

The initial reading will seem like a pile of foreign names, interesting sounding but irrelevant.  But upon multiple subsequent passing through the Bible, from time to time, you’ll come across certain names that you hadn’t expected to see outside those lists, and suddenly, they are more than just a name.

The point is, everything, anything in life, is hard at first.  And instead of asking a massive general questions like, “How do I understand the whole thing at once?”  Try asking a specific question, and go after the answer, one concrete question at a time.  Also, see how many names from a particular list show up in other narrative passages, and highlight them on the list.  Sometimes the highlights will fill up the list, or they will show a pattern, or something else.  How exciting!

Also click here for more information on this topic.

Question 2.

What does "edifying" mean?

This word is often interchangeably used with “build-up” (Gk. oikodomei) [Rom.14:19; 15:2; 2Cor.13:10; etc.], and it literally means to raise up a structure necessary for a building, such as walls and supporting beams and roof.  And the word “edify” shares the root-meaning with edifice or building.

As you can see the importance of a building to be standing firm and built up, the idea of edifying a person is also to raise up the inner person to be strong and fortified through various means, most importantly spiritually.

Here’s an article that highlights various ways to “edify” another brother or sister in Christ. 

-

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Episode 1: Speaking the Truth In Love & Career Decisions

Thank you to all who have submitted questions so far, we have been encouraged to have received a number of thought-provoking questions! To start off this series, Pastor Jim shares his wisdom on two questions concerning friendship and career.

Foreword from Jim

The main purpose of answering these questions are not to pretend I know everything, or even more than another person.  Nor is supplying knowledge base my priority #1.  Rather, it is to shepherd the members and friends of Harbour City Church, and to interact with our community with the Word of God and biblical worldview.  It is to build up our church onto maturity, and fellowship in the Holy Spirit.

As much as I can, I will point you to various other resources that are reliable and more thorough than I can cover in these rather short replies.

Some questions will merit biblical “apologetics”, but hopefully it won’t be seen as being “defensive.”  If that’s how I seem to come off, please privately and lovingly rebuke me.  I promise to listen.

And for the purpose of interacting with as many topics as possible and the individuals asking, I must try to be brief.  So, obviously, the answers will not be exhaustive, or touching on every point.  However, please feel free to reach out to ask follow-up questions.

-

Question 1.

If I have a friend that claims to be Christian although their lifestyle may suggest otherwise, is it unloving of me to rebuke them if I know they won't handle it well, or is it more unloving of me to not say anything and just pray about it?

First, I might steer you away from wanting to simply rebuke.  And from the way you framed this question and included the clause “I know they won't handle it well”, I would advise both caution and encouragement.  When [Ephesians 4:15] says, “speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ,” it’s important to note the operative phrase is “truth in love.”  Meaning, if either the truth or the love is compromised, then so is the entire effort to build-up or grow-up one another.  The caution is to consider why your friend won’t “handle it well.”  Is it because of his/her immaturity, or is it because he/she is doubtful of your loving intent?  The encouragement is to equip yourself first in combining both love and truth, and deliver it in such a way where your friend hears the truth he/she needs, but also you leave them with little doubt that you truly love him/her.  Only the Spirit of God will change a person’s heart, but He may use your loving testimony; so, you can never be sure that they “won’t handle it well.”  You might be pleasantly surprised!

In addition, instead of hitting someone over the head with Bible verses, I would have those appropriate passages memorized in paraphrased form, so you can casually work them into the conversation; and you will know deep inside that you’re not merely stating your personal opinions, but speaking out of God’s truth.  Also, in some cases, if you feel there is someone else who may be more available and effective due to closer relationship or such, involving them instead might not be a bad idea while you continue to keep your friend in active prayer.

Question 2.

How do I know if I have been called into a certain field of work or ministry?

God’s prescribed or dispositional will can be gleaned directly from the Scriptures.  However, not all of God’s sovereign will, including directions about every matter in life, can be gathered from the Bible.  Apostle John said, “there are also many other things that Jesus did. Were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.” [John 21:25]

However, to help clarify the matter of “calling” in particular, the church has long advised that you discern the two areas of “internal calling” and “external calling.”

• Internal Calling is the inward desire and burden of the heart brought on by the urging of the Holy Spirit.  We can discern this by asking certain self-diagnosing questions like: “How does this glorify God, and not simply gratify my personal desire?”  “How does this reflect obedience to God’s direct commandments, honor His wishes, and delight His heart?”  “How does this help God’s people (the church), even at my own personal cost?”

• External Calling is the affirmation of the relevant people and circumstances.  This can be discerned by asking other wise and godly brothers and sisters for their assessment, and taking inventory of one’s own objective assessment of personal set of gifts that may be suited for the task.  Of course, the “doors” of opportunity must be opening up for you by those in appropriate power and positions.

If you find that the internal and external callings are lining up in ways that are possible and encouraging, you might say it is reasonable to proceed.

-

If you have ever wondered about topics such as these, are curious about the how’s and why’s of Christianity or have any other questions in general ask Pastor Jim anything here.

Ask Pastor Jim Anything

Have you ever been curious about the origins of Christianity, or wanted to ask an anonymous question at church? Look no further, because our very own Pastor Jim is here to tackle all your questions.

Whether you’re curious about the how’s and why’s of church, struggle to understand some concepts or just want to get to know more about us, fill out the form below, and answers will be released fortnightly on our website, Facebook and Instagram.